Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest LinkedIn YouTube TikTok
    • Home
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Advertise
    • Mentorship
    • Editing Services
    • About
    • Contact
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest TikTok
    The Children's Book Review
    Subscribe
    • Books by Subject
    • Books by Age
      • Ages 0-3, Infant and Toddler
      • Ages 4-8, Preschool to Elementary
      • Ages 9-12, Preteen and Tween
      • Ages 12+, Teen and Young Adult
      • Books for First Grade Readers
      • Books for Second Grade Readers
      • Books for Third Grade Readers
    • Favorites
      • Diverse and Inclusive Books
      • Books About Activism
      • Best Books for Kids
      • Star Wars Books
      • Board Books
      • Books About Mindfulness
      • Dr. Seuss Books
    • Showcase
    • Interviews
      • Growing Readers Podcast
      • Author Interviews and Q&A
      • Illustrator Interviews
    • Kids’ Book Giveaways
    • Directory
    • Podcast
    The Children's Book Review

    Blog Tour: The Templeton Twins Have an Idea

    Bianca SchulzeBy Bianca Schulze4 Mins Read Ages 9-12 Books with Boy Characters Chapter Books Humor Reluctant Readers
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Solving the Problem of Problem-Solving

    By Ellis Weiner, for The Children’s Book Review
    Published: September 11, 2012

    Templeton Twins Book

    I’ve just finished writing the second Templeton Twins book, and it’s dawning on me that I am, apparently, interested in problem-solving. Who knew? But Book I and Book II spend a lot of time, not only having the Twins solve problems, but in walking them, and the reader, through the step-by-step process of either how they think about those problems, or how they literally solve them, or both.

    Now that you mention it, I think I can blame credit two people for this tendency in me: my high school physics teacher, Mr. Donald Kelbaugh, and the Russo-American author Mr. Vladimir Nabokov.

    From Mr. Kelbaugh I learned, almost in spite of myself, the the methodical approach of physics and, for that matter, all of science: that the way to solve a problem is to define it clearly, break it down into its constituent elements—there is a scene in Twins II where the Twins divide up the task of solving a problem by assigning Abigail the job of going over “what we know” and John the job of thinking about “what we don’t know”—and then devising procedures to obtain specific answers to those various questions.

    I know: Duh. But it’s only “duh” in retrospect, once you realize that’s what must be done, as opposed to flinging yourself against the totality of a problem and thrashing around in the hopes that it will get solved.

    From Nabokov, and especially his Lectures on Literature, I learned—or, at least, became brainwashed into believing in—the importance of specificity. Don’t just say, “Tom saw the dog.” Decide, and report, what kind of dog Tom saw—unless, that is, withholding that information is itself deliberate and important.

    That’s why, when I wrote about how the Twins, in Book I, devise a gimmick to place before their father a photo of the kind of dog they want, I had to ask myself, “Is it plausible to think that there would be a single overhead lighting fixture in the kitchen?” I decided it was, because they lived in an old house, and it seemed to me I had been in older kitchens with exactly that kind of (dreary, depressing) overhead lamp.

    Templeton Twins Book

    This sort of concern can, of course, be a pain in the neck. The reader (who is, say, eleven years old) doesn’t care about the history of small-town kitchen illumination. Neither, for that matter, does the writer. (The Narrator may say he does, but you know how he is. He’ll say anything to irritate me.)  But by playing fair with the details, you achieve at least three things: You force yourself to more fully imagine the scene, which helps make the writing better. You assist the reader in seeing the scene, which helps make the reading better. And you open yourself up to thinking about things, which otherwise would never have occurred to you, that might change and therefore improve the scene.

    Put them both together—the methodical examination of a problem; the need to cite specifics in a scene—and they equal problem-solving. And remember, I’ve never seen a single episode of McGuyver in spite of the fact that two of my best friends went to college with the guy who played him! Really!

    It is these two concerns that come together every time the Twins get out of a scrape. I can only hope that the reader finds these scenes (consciously or not) to be an unexpected change from problem-solving-via-Latin-incantation-and-wand-waving (which I have nothing against). I even think there may be something physically satisfying in those sequences.

    Let me know, you eleven-year-olds, if that’s the case.

    Note from Narrator

    The Templeton Twins: A Chapter Excerpt

    For more information, visit: http://templetontwins.tumblr.com

    Take the entire tour:

     

    Blog Name Tour Date
    Mundie Kids 10-Sep
    The Children’s Book Review 11-Sep
    There’s A Book 12-Sep
    Watch.Connect.Read 13-Sep
    Stiletto Storytime 14-Sep
    Middle Grade Mafioso 15-Sep
    sharpread 16-Sep
    The Book Cellar 17-Sep
    Mother Daughter BookClub.com 18-Sep
    Media Darlings 19-Sep
    The Book Monsters 20-Sep
    Karin’s Book Nook 21-Sep
    The O.W.L. 22-Sep
    The Children’s and Teens’ Book Connection 23-Sep
    Pink Me 24-Sep
    Book Dreaming 25-Sep

    What to Read Next:

    1. Giveaway: Horrid Henry Book
    2. Nicholas in Trouble: Rene Goscinny
    3. Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Last Straw: Book 3
    4. Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules

    *Disclosure: Please note that this post may contain affiliate links that share some commission. Rest assured that these will not affect the cost of any products and services promoted here. Our team always provides their authentic opinion in all content published on this site.

    Ellis Weiner
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleAnnie and Helen, by Deborah Hopkinson | Book Spotlight
    Next Article The Templeton Twins Have an Idea | Book Spotlight
    Bianca Schulze
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • LinkedIn

    Bianca Schulze is the founder of The Children’s Book Review. She is a reader, reviewer, mother and children’s book lover. She also has a decade’s worth of experience working with children in the great outdoors. Combined with her love of books and experience as a children’s specialist bookseller, the goal is to share her passion for children’s literature to grow readers. Born and raised in Sydney, Australia, she now lives with her husband and three children near Boulder, Colorado.

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    TCBR Supporter
    Recent Articles
    • 5 Stunning Summer-Themed Audiobooks for Ages 4 and Up
    • My Love for You Is Like the Night Sky | Awareness Tour
    • What Do You Do with Your Poo? | Book Review
    • Oliver’s Shadow, by Martin Knight-Yeager | Book Review
    • Hi! I’m Cher. I Go Everywhere: A Mindfuless Book For Children & Their Grownups | Dedicated Review
    TCBR Supporters
    sponsored | become a TCBR supporter today
    sponsored | become a TCBR supporter today

    sponsored | become a TCBR supporter today
    sponsored | become a TCBR supporter today
    Discover Kids Books by Age
    Best Books For Kids
    Media Kit: The Children's Book Review
    Author and Illustrator Showcase
    SEARCH
    BOOKS BY SUBJECT
    Archives
    Professional Resources

    Book Marketing Campaigns

    Writing Coaches and Editing Services

    Mentorship

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Policies
    • Advertise
    • TCBR Buzzworthy Mentions
    • About TCBR
    © 2025 The Children’s Book Review. All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.